|
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism of Action
The physiologic mechanism
of erection of
the penis involves
release of nitric oxide
(NO) in the corpus
cavernosum during sexual
stimulation. NO then activates the enzyme
guanylate cyclase, which results in increased levels of
cyclic guanosine
monophosphate (cGMP), producing smooth muscle relaxation
in the corpus cavernosum
and allowing inflow of blood. Sildenafil has no direct
relaxant effect
on isolated human
corpus cavernosum,
but enhances the effect
of nitric oxide (NO)
by inhibiting phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), which is
responsible for degradation
of cGMP in the corpus
cavernosum. When sexual
stimulation
causes local release
of NO, inhibition of PDE5 by sildenafil causes increased
levels of cGMP in the
corpus cavernosum,
resulting in smooth muscle
relaxation and
inflow of blood to
the corpus cavernosum. Sildenafil at recommended doses
has no effect in
the absence of sexual
stimulation.
Studies in vitro have shown that sildenafil is
selective for PDE5. Its effect
is more potent on
PDE5 than on other known phosphodiesterases (>80-fold
for PDE1, >1000-fold for PDE2, PDE3, and PDE4). The
approximately 4000-fold selectivity for PDE5 versus PDE3
is important because that PDE is involved in control
of cardiac contractility.
Sildenafil is only about 10-fold as potent
for PDE5 compared to PDE6, an enzyme
found in the retina; this lower selectivity is thought
to be the basis for
abnormalities related to color
vision observed with
higher doses or plasma
levels (see Pharmacodynamics).
In addition to
human corpus
cavernosum smooth muscle, PDE5 is also found in lower
concentrations in other tissues including platelets, vascular
and visceral smooth
muscle, and skeletal
muscle. The inhibition
of PDE5 in these tissues by sildenafil may be the basis
for the enhanced platelet antiaggregatory activity of
nitric oxide observed
in vitro, an inhibition of platelet
thrombus formation
in vivo and peripheral
arterial-venous dilatation in vivo.
Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism
Sildenafil citrate
is rapidly absorbed after oral
administration, with absolute bioavailability of about
40%. Its pharmacokinetics
are dose-proportional over the recommended dose
range. It is eliminated predominantly by hepatic metabolism
(mainly cytochrome
P450 3A4) and is converted to an active metabolite with
properties similar to the parent, sildenafil. The concomitant
use of potent cytochrome
P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., erythromycin, ketoconazole,
itraconazole) as well as the nonspecific
CYP inhibitor, cimetidine, is associated with increased
plasma levels of
sildenafil (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Both sildenafil and the metabolite
have terminal half lives of about 4 hours.
Absorption and Distribution: Sildenafil
citrate is rapidly
absorbed. Maximum observed plasma
concentrations are reached within 30 to 120 minutes (median
60 minutes) of oral
dosing in the fasted state. When sildenafil citrate
is taken with a high fat
meal, the rate of absorption
is reduced, with a mean
delay in Tmax of 60 minutes and a mean reduction
in Cmax of 29%. The mean
steady state volume
of distribution (Vss) for sildenafil is 105 L, indicating
distribution
into the tissues. Sildenafil and its major circulating
N-desmethyl metabolite
are both approximately 96% bound
to plasma proteins.
Protein binding is independent of total drug concentrations.
Based upon measurements of sildenafil in semen
of healthy volunteers 90 minutes after dosing, less than
0.001% of the administered dose
may appear in the semen
of patients.
Metabolism and Excretion: Sildenafil is
cleared predominantly by the CYP3A4
(major route) and CYP2C9 (minor route) hepatic
microsomal isoenzymes. The major circulating metabolite
results from N-desmethylation of sildenafil, and is itself
further metabolized. This metabolite
has a PDE selectivity profile
similar to sildenafil and an in vitro potency for
PDE5 approximately 50% of the parent
drug. Plasma concentrations of this metabolite
are approximately 40% of those seen for sildenafil, so
that the metabolite
accounts for about 20% of sildenafil's pharmacologic effects.
After either oral or
intravenous
administration, sildenafil is excreted as metabolites
predominantly in the feces
(approximately 80% of administered oral dose) and to a
lesser extent in the urine
(approximately 13% of the administered oral
dose). Similar values for pharmacokinetic parameters were
seen in normal volunteers
and in the patient
population, using a population pharmacokinetic approach.
Pharmacokinetics in Special Populations
Geriatrics: Healthy elderly volunteers (65
years or over) had a reduced clearance
of sildenafil, with tree
plasma concentrations
approximately 40% greater than those seen in healthy younger
volunteers (18-45 years).
Renal insufficiency: In volunteers with
mild (CLcr= 50-80 ml/min) and moderate (CLcr= 30-49 ml/min)
renal impairment,
the pharmacokinetics of a single oral
dose of sildenafil
citrate (50 mg)
were not altered. In volunteers with severe (CLcr= <30
ml/min) renal impairment,
sildenafil clearance was reduced, resulting in approximately
doubling of AUC and
Cmax compared to age-matched volunteers with
no renal impairment.
Hepatic Insufficiency: In volunteers with
hepatic cirrhosis
(Child-Pugh A and B), sildenafil clearance
was reduced, resulting in increases in AUC
(84%) and Cmax (47%) compared to age-matched
volunteers with no hepatic
impairment.
Therefore, age >65,
hepatic impairment
and severe renal impairment
are associated with increased plasma
levels of sildenafil. A starting oral dose of 25 mg should
be considered in those patients (see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION).
Pharmacodynamics
Effects of Sildenafil Citrate on Erectile Response:
In eight double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover
studies of patients with either organic
or psychogenic
erectile dysfunction,
sexual stimulation
resulted in improved erections, as assessed by an objective
measurement of hardness
and duration of
erections (RigiScan), after sildenafil citrate administration
compared with placebo. Most studies assessed the efficacy
of sildenafil citrate
approximately 60 minutes post
dose. The erectile response, as assessed by penile
plethysmography, generally increased with increasing sildenafil
dose and plasma
concentration. The time
course of effect was examined in one study, showing an
effect for up to
4 hours but the response
was diminished compared to 2 hours.
Effects of Sildenafil Citrate on Blood Pressure:
Single oral doses of sildenafil (100 mg) administered
to healthy volunteers produced decreases in supine
blood pressure
(mean maximum decrease
of 8.4/5.5 mmHg). The decrease in blood
pressure was most
notable approximately 1-2 hours after dosing, and was
not different than placebo
at 8 hours. Similar effects on blood
pressure were noted
with 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg of sildenafil citrate, therefore
the effects are not related to dose
or plasma levels.
Larger effects were recorded among patients receiving
concomitant
nitrates (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
Single oral doses of
sildenafil up to 100 mg produced no clinically relevant
changes in the ECGs of normal
male volunteers.
Studies have produced relevant data on the effects of
sildenafil citrate on cardiac
output. In one small, open-label, uncontrolled, pilot
study, eight patients with stable
ischemic heart disease
underwent Swan-Ganz catheterization. A total dose
of 40 mg sildenafil was administered by four intravenous
infusions.
The results from this pilot study are shown in TABLE 1A
and TABLE 1B; the mean
resting systolic
and diastolic
blood pressures decreased
by 7% and 10% compared to baseline
in these patients. Mean resting
values for right atrial
pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery
occluded pressure and cardiac
output decreased
by 28%, 28%, 20% and 7% respectively. Even though this
total dosage produced
plasma sildenafil
concentrations which were approximately 2 to 5 times higher
than the mean maximum
plasma concentrations following a single oral
dose of 100 mg in healthy
male volunteers, the
hemodynamic response
to exercise was
preserved in these patients.
| TABLE 1A
Hemodynamic Data in Patients with Stable Ischemic
Heart Disease After IV
Administration of 40 mg Sildenafil |
| At Rest |
| Means±SD |
n |
Baseline
(B2) |
n |
Sildenafil
(D1) |
| PAOP
(mmHg) |
8 |
8.1±5.1 |
8 |
6.5±4.3 |
| Mean
PAP (mmHg) |
8 |
16.7±4 |
8 |
12.1±3.9 |
| Mean
RAP (mmHg) |
7 |
5.7±3.7 |
8 |
4.1±3.7 |
| Systolic
SAP (mmHg) |
8 |
150.4±12.4 |
8 |
140.6±16.5 |
| Diastolic
SAP (mmHg) |
8 |
73.6±7.8 |
8 |
65.9±10 |
| Cardiac
Output (L/min) |
8 |
5.6±0.9 |
8 |
5.2±1.1 |
| Heart
Rate (bpm) |
8 |
67±11.1 |
8 |
66.9±12 |
| TABLE 1B
Hemodynamic Data in Patients with Stable Ischemic
Heart Disease After IV
Administration of 40 mg Sildenafil |
| After 4
Minutes of Exercise |
| Means±SD |
n |
Baseline |
n |
Sildenafil |
| PAOP
(mmHg) |
8 |
36.0±13.7 |
8 |
27.8±15.3 |
| Mean
PAP (mmHg) |
8 |
39.4±12.9 |
8 |
31.7±13.2 |
| Mean
RAP (mmHg) |
¾ |
¾ |
¾ |
¾ |
| Systolic
SAP (mmHg) |
8 |
199.5±37.4 |
8 |
187.8±30.0 |
| Diastolic
SAP (mmHg) |
8 |
84.6±9.7 |
8 |
79.5±9.4 |
| Cardiac
Output (L/min) |
8 |
11.5±2.4 |
8 |
10.2±3.5 |
| Heart
Rate (bpm) |
8 |
101.9±11.6 |
8 |
99.0±20.4 |
Effects of Sildenafil Citrate on Vision: At
single oral doses of 100 mg and 200 mg, transient
dose-related impairment
of color discrimination (blue/green) was detected using
the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test, with peak effects near
the time of peak plasma
levels. This finding is consistent with the inhibition
of PDE6, which is involved in phototransduction in the retina.
An evaluation of
visual function
at doses up to twice the maximum recommended dose
revealed no effects of sildenafil citrate
on visual acuity, electroretinograms, intraocular
pressure, or pupillometry. CLINICAL
STUDIES
In clinical studies,
sildenafil citrate
was assessed for its effect on the ability of men with
erectile dysfunction
(ED) to engage in sexual activity and in many cases specifically
on the ability to achieve and maintain an erection
sufficient for satisfactory sexual
activity. Sildenafil citrate was evaluated primarily at
doses of 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg in 21 randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trials of up to 6 months in duration,
using a variety of study designs (fixed dose, titration,
parallel, crossover). Sildenafil citrate
was administered to more than 3000 patients aged
19 to 87 years, with ED
of various etiologies (organic, psychogenic, mixed) with
a mean duration
of 5 years. Sildenafil citrate
demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared
to placebo in all
21 studies. The studies that established benefit
demonstrated improvements in success rates for sexual
intercourse
compared with placebo.
The effectiveness
of sildenafil citrate
was evaluated in most studies using several assessment
instruments. The primary measure
in the principal studies was a sexual
function questionnaire
(the International Index of Erectile Function - IIEF)
administered during a 4-week treatment-free run-in period,
at baseline, at follow-up
visits, and at the end
of double-blind, placebo-controlled, at-home treatment.
Two of the questions from the IIEF served as primary study
end points; categorical
responses were elicited to questions about (1) the ability
to achieve erections sufficient for sexual intercourse
and (2) the maintenance of erections after penetration.
The patient addressed
both questions at the final visit
for the last 4 weeks of the study. The possible categorical
responses to these questions were (0) no attempted intercourse,
(1) never or almost never, (2) a few times, (3) sometimes,
(4) most times, and (5) almost always or always. Also
collected as party
of the IIEF was information about other aspects of sexual
function, including information on erectile
function, orgasm, desire, satisfaction with intercourse,
and overall sexual
satisfaction. Sexual function
data were also recorded by patients in a daily diary.
In addition, patients were asked a global efficacy question
and an optional partner questionnaire
was administered.
The effect on one
of the major end points,
maintenance of erections after penetration
were pooled as results of 5 fixed dose, dose-response
studies of greater than one month duration, showing response
according to baseline
function. Results with all doses have been pooled, but
scores showed greater improvement at the 50 and 100 mg
doses than at 25 mg. The pattern of responses was similar
for the other principal
question, the ability to achieve an erection
sufficient for intercourse. The titration studies, in
which most patients received 100 mg, showed similar results.
Regardless of the baseline
levels of function, subsequent function
in patients treated with sildenafil citrate
was better than that seen in patients treated with placebo.
At the same time, on-treatment function
was better in treated patients who were less impaired
at baseline.
The frequency of patients reporting improvement of erections
in response to a global question were pooled in four of
the randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled
fixed dose studies
(1797 patients) of 12 to 24 weeks duration. These patients
had erectile dysfunction
at baseline that was characterized by median
categorical scores of 2 (a few times) on principal
IIEF questions. Erectile dysfunction
was attributed to organic (58%; generally not characterized,
but including diabetes
and excluding spinal cord
injury), psychogenic
(17%), or mixed (24%)
etiologies. Sixty-three percent, 74%, and 82% of the patients
on 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg of sildenafil citrate, respectively,
reported an improvement in their erections, compared to
24% on placebo. In the titration
studies (n=644) (with most patients eventually receiving
100 mg), results were similar.
The patients in studies had varying degrees of ED. One-third
to one-half of the subjects in these studies reported
successful intercourse
at least once during a 4-week, treatment-free run-in period.
In many of the studies, of both fixed dose
and titration
designs, daily diaries were kept by patients. In these
studies, involving about 1600 patients, analyses of patient
diaries showed no effect
of sildenafil citrate
on rates of attempted intercourse
(about 2 per week),
but there was clear treatment-related improvement in sexual
function: per patient
weekly success rates averaged 1.3 on 50-100 mg of sildenafil
citrate vs 0.4 on
placebo; similarly, group mean success rates (total successes
divided by total attempts) were about 66% on sildenafil
citrate vs about
20% on placebo.
During 3 to 6 months of double-blind treatment
or longer-term (1 year), open-label studies, few patients
withdrew from active treatment
for any reason, including lack of effectiveness. At the
end of the long-term
study, 88% of patients reported that sildenafil citrate
improved their erections.
Men with untreated ED
had relatively low baseline
scores for all aspects of sexual
function measured
(again using a 5-point scale) in the IIEF. Sildenafil
citrate improved
these aspects of sexual
function: frequency, firmness and maintenance of erections;
frequency of orgasm; frequency and level of desire; frequency,
satisfaction and enjoyment of intercourse; and overall
relationship satisfaction.
One randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled
study included only patients with erectile
dysfunction
attributed to complications of diabetes
mellitus (n=268). As in the other titration
studies, patients were started on 50 mg and allowed to
adjust the dose up
to 100 mg or down to 25 mg of sildenafil citrate; all
patients, however, were receiving 50 mg or 100 mg at the
end of the study. There
were highly statistically significant improvements on
the two principal
IIEF questions (frequency of successful penetration during
sexual activity and
maintenance of erections after penetration) on sildenafil
citrate compared
to placebo. On a global improvement question, 57% of sildenafil
citrate patients
reported improved erections versus 10% on placebo. Diary
data indicated that on sildenafil citrate, 48% of intercourse
attempts were successful versus 12% on placebo.
One randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover,
flexible-dose (up to 100 mg) study of patients with erectile
dysfunction
resulting from spinal cord
injury (n=178) was conducted. The changes from baseline
in scoring on the two end
point questions (frequency
of successful penetration during sexual
activity and maintenance of erections after penetration)
were highly statistically significantly in favor of sildenafil
citrate. On a global improvement question, 83% of patients
reported improved erections on sildenafil citrate
versus 12% on placebo. Diary data indicated that on sildenafil
citrate, 59% of attempts at sexual
intercourse
were successful compared to 13% on placebo.
Across all trials, sildenafil citrate
improved the erections of 43% of radical
prostatectomy patients compared to 15% on placebo.
Subgroup analyses of responses to a global improvement
question in patients with psychogenic
etiology in two fixed-dose studies (total n=179) and two
titration studies (total n=149) showed 84% of sildenafil
citrate patients
reported improvement in erections compared with 26% of
placebo. The changes from baseline
in scoring on the two end
point questions (frequency
of successful penetration during sexual
activity and maintenance of erections after penetration)
were highly statistically significantly in favor of sildenafil
citrate. Diary data in two of the studies (n=178) showed
rates of successful intercourse per attempt of 70% for
sildenafil citrate
and 29% for placebo.
A review of population
subgroups demonstrated efficacy regardless of baseline
severity, etiology, race
and age. Sildenafil citrate
was effective in a broad range
of ED patients, including
those with a history of coronary artery disease, hypertension,
other cardiac disease,
peripheral vascular
disease, diabetes
mellitus, depression, coronary artery bypass
graft (CABG), radical
prostatectomy, transurethral
resection of the
prostate (TURP)
and spinal cord injury,
and in patients taking anti-depressants/antipsychotics
and antihypertensives/diuretics.
Analysis of the safety database showed no apparent
difference in the side effect
profile in patients
taking sildenafil citrate
with and without antihypertensive medication. This analysis
was performed retrospectively, and was not powered to
detect any pre-specified difference in adverse reactions.
|
|